Cad History, Cad Revolution In Present World And Training Facility In Cad Studio

Cad history, cad revolution in present world and training facility in cad studio

by

narendra kholiya

Cad history, cad revolution in present world and training facility in cad studio

Many of the computer-aided design programs we use today have been around for more than a decade, and virtually all trace their lineage to work begun more than 50 years ago.

Modern engineering design and drafting can be traced back to the development of descriptive geometry in the 16th and 17th centuries. Drafting methods improved with the introduction of drafting machines, but the creation of engineering drawings changed very little until after World War II.

During the war, considerable work was done in the development of real-time computing, particularly at MIT, and by the 1950s there were dozens of people working on numerical control of machine tools and automating engineering design. But it s the work of two people in particular Patrick Han-ratty and Ivan Sutherland who are largely credited with setting the stage for what we know today as CAD.

The Fathers of CAD

Han-ratty is widely credited as the Father of CADD/CAM. In 1957, while working at GE, he developed PRONTO (Program for Numerical Tooling Operations), the first commercial CNC programming system. Five years later, Sutherland presented his Ph.D. thesis at MIT titled Sketchpad, A Man-Machine Graphical Communication System. Among its features, the first graphical user interface, using a light pen to manipulate objects displayed on a CRT.

The 1960s brought other developments, including the first digitizer (from Auto-troll) and DAC-1, the first production interactive graphics manufacturing system. By the end of the decade, a number of companies were founded to commercialize their fledgling CAD programs, including SDRC, Evans & Sutherland, Applicon, Computer vision, and M&S Computing.

By the 1970s, research had moved from 2D to 3D. Major milestones included the work of Ken Versprille, whose invention of NURBS for his Ph.D. thesis formed the basis of modern 3D curve and surface modeling, and the development by Alan Grayer, Charles Lang, and Ian Braid of the PADL (Part and Assembly Description Language) solid modeler.

With the emergence of UNIX workstations in the early 80s, commercial CAD systems like CATIA and others began showing up in aerospace, automotive, and other industries. But it was the introduction of the first IBM PC in 1981 that set the stage for the large-scale adoption of CAD. The following year, a group of programmers formed Autodesk, and in 1983 released AutoCAD, the first significant CAD program for the IBM PC.

The CAD Revolution

AutoCAD marked a huge milestone in the evolution of CAD. Its developers set out to deliver 80% of the functionality of the other CAD programs of the day, for 20% of their cost. From then on, increasingly advanced drafting and engineering functionality became more affordable. But it was still largely 2D.

That changed in 1987 with the release of Pro/ENGINEER, a CAD program based on solid geometry and feature-based parametric techniques for defining parts and assemblies. It ran on UNIX workstations PCs of the time were simply not powerful enough but it was a game changer. The later years of the decade saw the release of several 3D modeling kernels, most notably ACIS and Para solids, which would form the basis for other history-based parametric CAD programs.

By the 1990s, the PC was capable of the computations required by 3D CAD. In 1995, when the first issue of Desktop Engineering was published, Solid Works was released. It was the first significant solid modeler for Windows. This was followed by Solid Edge, Inventor, and others. The decade also saw many of the original CAD developers from the 1960s acquired by newer companies and a consolidation of the industry into four main players Autodesk, Dassault Systems (which acquired Solid Works in 1997), PTC, and UGS (now Siemens PLM) along with a host of smaller developers.

CAD Today, CAD Tomorrow

The modern CAD era has been marked by improvements in modeling, incorporation of analysis, and management of the products we create, from conception and engineering to manufacturing, sales, and maintenance (what has become known as PLM, product lifecycle management). But what of the world of tomorrow?

Engineers and designers are being asked to create more, faster, and with higher quality, says Bill McClure, vice president of product development at Siemens PLM. He notes that CAD really hasn t changed much beyond adding more features and updating the user interface. We need a new way of working to keep up with demands, he says. Siemens synchronous technology was developed to address this trend, as it combines the precision and control of feature-based design with the speed and flexibility of explicit modeling. The result is designers spend less time planning a model s construction, less time waiting for design changes, and less time remodeling imported or customer data for new uses.

PTC is taking a similar approach with the recent announcement of its Project Lightning, which was revealed as Creo in October.

Brian Shepherd, executive vice president of product development at PTC, described Creo as PTC s answer to this question about the next 20 years of CAD, and claims it will solve ease-of-use, interoperability, and assembly management problems with CAD.

Almost all CAD revenue has been through parametric modelers, following the paradigm that Pro/E invented, he says. But parametric modeling is an abstract approach for creating geometry. You build a recipe and then the recipe creates the geometry. Direct modeling is much easier for people to understand, says Shepherd. We think the right answer is a blend of parametric and explicit modeling.

Creo promises to do just that by releasing a series of apps that allow users to design in 2D, 3D direct or 3D parametric modes, with the data updated and reusable in any of those modes. It also offers different user interfaces for different kinds of users, and promises to allow users to incorporate data from any CAD system.

The feature-based paradigm will not get us to the next level, says Mike Payne. Something like direct modeling is needed to attract a larger audience to CAD. And Payne should know. Over the years, he has been vice president of development at PTC, was a co-founder of Solid Works, CTO of Dassault Systems, CEO of Spatial Corp., and co-founder and former CEO of Space Claim.

Robert Buzz Kross, senior vice president of the Manufacturing Industry Group at Autodesk, sees three technologies that will have the greatest impact on the future of CAD: new, very friendly, very interactive interfaces, embedded simulation, and the cloud. The first, he explained, will attract new users and will support faster design iterations. Embedded simulations will enable users to analyze design data as they model, so that designers will immediately know the result of any change before they commit to it. And the cloud, will deliver immense compute power to everyone s device, even mobile devices.

Features at CAD STUDIO:

?Focused software sales effort has been recognized by Autodesk with Best Partner award consistently. Autodesk has selected us as Autodesk Premier Solution Partner (PSP) for Northern India for most of its verticals.

?Training philosophy is to impart application-oriented training and over the years we have built a reputation for best quality training on CAD & students enroll at our Training Canters with only one motto in mind – Best CAD Training.

?has built a dedicated team of Architects, Mechanical and Civil Engineers, Planners, Geo-specialist to provide and support world leading CAD and related software solutions to its large and wide CAD user client base.

?Is multi-location with Head Office at New Delhi and branches at Lucknow, Jaipur, Chandigarh and Gurgaon. Dedicated support & training facility at each location serve our customer with best pre and post sales and training.

The author is the main chair person of Matrix financial services company, and posting article to full fill the needed costumers, with sufficient information about the organization.

Article Source:

ArticleRich.com